Chronic venous insufficiency
Main references
The VCHH is outlined in
Malone, P.C. & Agutter, P. S. (2007) The aetiology of deep venous thrombosis. Quart. J. Med. 99, 581-593. PMID: 16905749.
It is explained in full detail, together with its clinical, scientific, historical and philosophical background and significance, in
Malone, P. C. & Agutter, P. S. (2008) The Aetiology of Deep Venous Thrombosis: a Critical, Historical and Epistemological Survey; Springer, Dordrecht.
For contents and synopsis, download here ---> The Aetiology of Deep Venous Thrombosis.pdf
This book discusses the variety of investigative approaches that have been taken to the study of DVT during the past four centuries and emphasises the 160-year-old philosophical and methodological schism in biomedical research. Using DVT as an example, it is shown how this schism may be bridged to the benefit of both research and clinical practice.
The extension of the VCHH to explain CVI is explained in
Malone, P.C. & Agutter, P. S. (2008) To what extent might deep venous thrombosis and chronic venous insufficiency share a common aetiology? Internat. Angiol., in press. PMID:
Reviews
Prof. Alun Davies has written in Venous Times:
This interesting and small text focuses on numerous aspects of DVT or real venous thromboembolic disease. The authors initially focus on the generalities including Virchow's Triad. They then move on to looking at hypercoagulability and then stasis and the importance of hypoxia. The text and references are very comprehensive and hence the book will be of value to those researching the finer points of DVT/VTE and it is a text that will be a useful addition to any library where clinicians wish to explore some of the fundamental issues behind the aetiological factors involved. I have enjoyed reading this book and recommend it to others who have an interest in the field.
Professor A Nicolaides MD FRCS wrote:
“I have read some of the chapters and I am most impressed. It is well written, scholarly and deals with the subject in "4-D" i.e. not as we know it now but as knowledge developed in time. For me, who has lived through the development of the subject since the late 1960s and reviewed the literature as far back as Hippocrates, it was like reading a novel that I could not put down.”
BOOK REVIEW
P. C. Malone and P. S. Agutter.—The Aetiology of Deep Venous Thrombosis". A volume of 144 pages. Sprin¬ger, Dordrecht, 008. $ 149.00
Ideas about the subject we now term 'Deep Venous Thrombosis' {DVT} have grown like a 400 year old tree. Young branches arise from the gnarled trunk and roots ; they appear healthy and active, but they carry many of the parasites that have beset the tree since its sapling years. Old branches may seem dead, but they are not. This volume sets out to trace the tree's history, identifying the directions in which it has grown - and the parasites to which it has fallen and still falls prey - in the hope that a plan for its future well being can be developed.
Most accounts of DVT emphasize the role of blood coagulation and infer that various forms of 'hypercoagulability’ increase the likelihood of thrombosis. This infe¬rence is not in doubt. However, the implicit premise that. DVT is caused by a perturbation of the coagulation mechanism can be challenged. Eminent physiologists pondered this matter for some 200 years ; in the late 19th and early 20th centuries they demonstrated that changes in 'formed blood elements' precede fibrin formation. Further investigation revealed that the first response to injury in the venous valve pockets (VVP) is the local ‘swarming’ of leukocytes as well as plate-lets - not a change in coagulation. Coagulation is obviously involved in thrombogenesis, but it is not the initiating event; and most vic¬tims of DVT have normally coagulable rather than hyper-coagulable blood.
In such ways, the book emphasises historical exege¬sis; but it does not presume that history is a cure for ignorance. The past is re-examined, not for its own sake, but in order to address modern questions and to envisage possibly new answers. The starting points are the appa¬rent overthrow of Galenism during the century 1535-1635, the description of venous valves by Fabri-cius, and Har¬vey's complete re-think of blood motion. The findings of Fabricius were crucial for Harvey's discovery; they are now shown to be the basis of a new hypothesis of DVT aetiol-ogy, the valve cusp hypoxia hypothesis (VCHH). According to the VCHH, thrombi form uniquely in venous valves and VVT and may destroy them, or at least impair their function. Cir-culation of the blood is a sine qua non of thrombogenesis.
But Galenist notions have survived in contemporary as well as older accounts of the causa-tion of DVT. 'Sta¬sis' is a prominent example. Galen's notion of blood move¬ment implied nodes of stasis at the anatomical extrema; Harvey's circulatory theory refuted that inference. Also, there is long-standing experimental evidence that static blood, in situ (i.e within an uninjured vein) coagulates only verv slowly, if at all, and therefore presumably does not thrombose. Yet the con-sensus account of DVT claims 'stasis' as a causal or permissive factor, a contention dismissed by Virchow ( - "the doctrine of stasis rests on manifold misinterpretations.") among others. Ac-cording to the VCHH, only when the inner (parietalis) endothelium of the valve cusp is injured, and living leukocvtes and platelets are supplied by the circulating blood, can thrombogenesis be initiated.
Another essentially Galenic notion, 'inflammation', was once considered causal in DVT. Cer-tainly, the first visi¬ble event in thromogenesis is the local accumulation of colourless corpuscles - hence the white core of a nascent thrombus and the lines of Zahn. Before leukocytes were identi-fied and their functions partially understood, such white semi-solid masses were dubbed 'pus'. John Hunter advised us to regard 'inflammation' as a healing ('salutory') rather than a patho-logical process; yet the notion that DVT can have an 'inflammatory' aetiology still persists hidden in the 19th century oxymoron 'thrombophlebitis'.
The VCHH is closely related to the concept of ischaemic-reperfusion injury. Both were adum-brated in concurrent but unconnected publications (1977) and both emphasise vascular endo-thelial injury and local leucocyte invasion. Nevertheless there are fundamental diffe¬rences be-tween them; they are two different trees whose limbs have become entangled.
The main thrust of the book is to show that ideas sprin¬ging from the apparently dead roots of the old pathophysiological tradition can throw fresh light on current con¬cerns, and that such ideas can be reconciled producti¬vely with the 'mechanistic' studies that dominate the current literature. The history and current status of DVT research constitute a clear justification for this optimistic claim.
The book consists of 13 chapters. A general introduction (chapter 1) followed by a review of the blood coagulation mechanism (chapter 2) and "hypercoagulabilty" (chapter 3) as understood today. The historical disco-veries that have led to our current knowledge of venous thromboem-bolism are dealt with in chapters 4-8. Chap¬ters 9-11 focus on the valves and valve pockets and the valve cusp hypoxia hypothesis. In chapter 12 the valve cusp hypoxia hypothesis, is sup-plemented and enriched by recent discoveries in the molecular biology of endothelial cells and their responses to hypoxia. Finally, chapter 13 deals with intravascular coagulation after death (post mortem thrombi or clots). This book is a critical histo¬rical and scientific survey of the eti-ology of DVT. It is highly recommended to all students, researchers and physicians interested in the subject. It is highly stimulating and informative. Prof. A. Nicolaides
Website built and maintained by Webs Online
THEORETICAL MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY GROUP
An independent academic organisation centred in Glossop, Derbyshire, U.K.
